Schwules albanien düsseldorf

In Ghana ist ein menschenwürdiges Leben als LSBTI unmöglich. Offen zu leben ist ausgeschlossen. Es drohen grausame, unmenschliche oder erniedrigende Behandlung bis hin zu Folter bzw. Polizei und Gerichte sind somit nicht Schützer, sondern Verfolger. Der Lesben- und Schwulenverband hat hier zahlreiche Berichte über die Menschenrechtslage in dem westafrikanischen Land zusammengestellt.

Wir fordern von der Bundesregierung auch, dass sie Ghana und der Senegal von der Liste der asylrechtlich als "sicheren Herkunftsstaaten" geltenden Länder streichen. In all diesen Berichten wird deutlich, dass ein auch nur in Ansätzen menschenwürdiges Leben als LSBTI in Ghana nicht möglich ist.

Offen zu leben ist ausgeschlossen, es könnte grausame, unmenschliche oder erniedrigende Behandlung oder Bestrafung oder gar Folter Konversionsbehandlungen und Zwangsanaluntersuchungen bzw. Damit stehen LSBTI in Ghana auch der massiven gesellschaftlichen Diskriminierung und Ächtung ohne staatlichen Schutz wehrlos gegenüber.

Praktisch alle LSBTI in Ghana entscheiden sich daher aus Angst vor Verfolgung, ungeoutet zu leben oder das Land zu verlassen. Ein Ausleben der eigenen sexuellen Orientierung — und sei es im Geheimen — bedeutet in Ghana somit immer eine sehr konkrete Gefahr für das eigene Leben.

Die psychischen Belastungen, die mit einem solchen Leben in der Regel einhergehen, sind immens. Dies war der höchste Prozentsatz aller untersuchten Länder. März anführen [1] :. The law does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. There were no reports of adults prosecuted or convicted for consensual same-sex sexual conduct.

LGBTI persons faced widespread discrimination in education and employment.

Schwules albanien: eine reise wert, auch für düsseldorfer

In June , following his visit to the country in April, UN Special Rapporteur Alston noted that stigma and discrimination against LGBTI persons made it difficult for them to find work and become productive members of the community. As of September the CHRAJ had received 34 reports of discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

LGBTI persons also faced police harassment and extortion attempts. There were reports police were reluctant to investigate claims of assault or violence against LGBTI persons. While there were no reported cases of police or government violence against LGBTI persons during the year, stigma, intimidation, and the attitude of the police toward LGBTI persons were factors in preventing victims from reporting incidents of abuse.

Gay men in prison were vulnerable to sexual and other physical abuse. In August LGBTI activists reported police abuse involving a young gay man robbed en route to meet a person he met on a dating site. When the man reported the incident to police, they took him briefly into custody because he mentioned to them that he was gay.

Amnesty International reported in that authorities conducted involuntary medical tests on two young men who were allegedly found having sex. Some activists reported that police attitudes were slowly changing, with community members feeling more comfortable with certain police officers to whom they could turn for assistance, such as the IGP-appointed uniformed liaison officers.

Activists also cited improved CHRAJ-supported activities, such as awareness raising via social media. As one example, the CHRAJ published announcements about citizen rights and proper channels to report abuses on an LGBTI dating site. A leading human rights NGO held a legal education workshop for law enforcement for the first time in the conservative Northern Region.

A coalition of LGBTI-led organizations from throughout the country, officially registered in November , held its first general assembly in September.